Sample — not a real result

This is exactly what you get for $6.99.

Nothing here is blurred or held back. This is the whole product, filled in with an invented person’s results so you can see it before you decide. Yours is built from your own answers.

1. Your certificate

A4 landscape, print-ready PDF, with your name, score, band, percentile and your four domain results. Download the sample and look at it properly — it is the real file, just watermarked.

IQSCORECERTIFICATE OF COGNITIVE ASSESSMENTThis is to certify thatAlex Morgancompleted the IQScore cognitive assessment and achievedIQ SCORE124SUPERIOR91st–97th percentileSPATIAL78%NUMERICAL89%LOGICAL83%APPLIED72%ISSUEDREFERENCESAMPLE-0000iqscore.io36-question assessment across four cognitive domainsAn estimated score from an online assessment. Not a clinical diagnosis.SAMPLE

2. Your full written report

Around 1,500 words, written from your actual answers rather than your band. It speaks to you directly — here is how the opening reads, written for the invented result above.

What your score actually says

A score of 124 puts you in the Superior band, which is roughly the top 6% of people who take this assessment. That number on its own is less interesting than the shape underneath it, and your shape is unusually lopsided.

Your numerical reasoning came out at 89%, the strongest of your four domains by a clear margin. That is not a small thing: the numerical items are the ones most people lose points on under time pressure, because they reward holding several partial results in working memory at once. Scoring that high suggests you are not solving those sequentially so much as recognising the structure early and skipping the intermediate steps.

Your applied reasoning, at 72%, is the outlier in the other direction. The gap between it and your numerical score is 17 points, and gaps that wide usually mean something specific rather than general. Looking at which applied items you missed, the pattern is that your errors cluster on questions where the everyday framing contradicted the underlying logic.

The full report, section by section

  1. Cognitive Assessment Summary — the excerpt above is its opening
  2. Spatial Reasoning Analysis
  3. Numerical Reasoning Analysis
  4. Logical Reasoning Analysis
  5. Applied Reasoning Analysis
  6. Cognitive Strengths
  7. Development Opportunities
  8. Recommended Next Steps — what to actually do, from your results

Around 1,500 words across the eight, every one written from the answers you actually gave.

3. All 36 questions, explained

Every question, your answer, the correct answer, and a real explanation of the reasoning. Two examples, written to the same length and depth as the ones you would receive.

A shape rotates 90° clockwise at each step, and every second step it also flips vertically. What does step five look like?

Your answer:Rotated 270°, no flip✗
Correct answer:Rotated 0°, flipped vertically✓
Why

Two rules are running at once and they have different cycle lengths. The rotation returns to where it started every four steps, so by step five it has come full circle and is back at 0°. The flip only applies on even-numbered steps, and step five is odd, so you might expect no flip at all. The catch is that flips accumulate: steps two and four both flipped it, and two flips cancel out, but the fourth flip leaves it inverted going into step five. Track each rule on its own clock rather than trying to hold the combined shape in your head, and the answer falls out.

Every member of the club plays chess. Some chess players compete nationally. Therefore some club members compete nationally. Is this valid?

Your answer:Valid✗
Correct answer:Invalid✓
Why

This one catches almost everybody, because the conclusion sounds so reasonable. All club members are chess players, and some chess players compete nationally, but nothing guarantees the overlap falls inside the club. The nationally competing players could all be people from outside it. For a syllogism like this to work, the "some" statement has to start from the group you are reasoning about, not the larger group it sits inside. Ask yourself whether you could draw the diagram with zero overlap and still satisfy every premise. If you can, it is invalid.

These two are written for this page. The ones you receive are for the actual questions you answered.

That is the whole thing.

The test and your score are free, and always will be. The $6.99 is for the certificate, the report and the answers, in one payment.

Already got your result? It’s still open in your other tab — everything above is one payment there, $6.99.

Take the free test

One payment. Everything. Nothing else to buy, ever.